Ignosticism Advanced: And on Referential Justification
Over the past 10 years, I’ve developed the concept of ignosticism into a formal demonstration that can either prove or disprove the existence of God. In a nutshell, ignosticism asks you to describe “God.” Simple enough, right? It’s not as easy as it sounds. When a person says they have a belief in God, what is it they mean by "God"? One might say God is three in one. Another might say none is greater than God. Both are fine definitions. The problem arises when competing definitions for the same God negate each other. Three is not one. So, what is it we are talking about? How can we talk about a self-negating concept? It’s nonsensical. We can’t speak meaningfully of it. Hence, the ignostic holds religious people tend to presume too much about God. The description part is to test the coherence of the object being described. Many theological descriptions of God are sophisticated but incoherent. So, what is it we are talking abou...