Fool Me Once



Nothing theologically profound. I just wanted to remind everyone that God is still absent and all is well.


Also, which are the darker chess pieces? The top series or the bottom series?


Can you tell? 


Actually...




They're exactly the same shade of gray!
 

It's hard to believe, but it's true.


It's also hard to believe that God exists, at least the God Christians so often talk about as being a real influencing agent on their lives. But sometimes I wonder, if we can be so easily deceived, could it be that, maybe (just maybe) they are under an illusion?


It's sort of sad to think about so many people under a veil of deceit. But then I saw Julia Sweeney's monologue "Letting Go of God" and I instantly cheered up. There is hope! I highly recommend it to my Christan family and friends who are on the fence, so to speak, about all this God business.


Definitely watch it if you get the chance. It's so sincere, and charming, intelligent and funny all at the same time--and she comes off as entirely respectful toward religion. I found her journey toward atheism very similar to my own (as cliche as it must sound). I did thoroughly enjoy the part where she's so saturated with the Bible and is watching from her car as people waft to church in their Sunday best, and she mentions she just wanted to roll down the window and scream out, "Have you actually read the Bible?" 


Indeed, it will make an atheist of you every time (that is, if you understood it). I firmly believe it's only those who don't understand the Bible who can pretend to keep believing in it's "truth." 


At any rate, live well and be wise.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Discussing the Historicity of Jesus with a Christian Agnostic

Image
Steven Jake, the author of the up and coming blog  TheChristian Agnostic , [1]  wrote a rather thorough response to my lengthy comment asking him about the state of the evidence regarding the historical Jesus. I am pleased he took the time to write a thorough response. I only feel that such a thorough response deserves my own more detailed response as my initial comment was merely that—a comment. So without further ado I will address some of Steven Jake’s comments and concerns. Initially Steven Jake (henceforth SJ) posted a quote from New Testament scholar Bart Ehrman claiming that there is an abundance of evidence for a historical Jesus. I merely contested this claim asking for what evidence we have that would be considered historically reliable. As I see it there is none. That doesn’t mean, however, I don’t think there  wasn’t  a historical Jesus, just that we cannot prove if there was or wasn’t and so I remain agnostic as to the historicity of Je...
Read more

Conflating Atheism and Agnosticism is a Mistake

Image
In a discussion over at Bud's blog Dead Logic , a reader asked a question I have been hearing more and more recently. It's a good question, so I thought I would do my part to try and answer it. Doesn't admitting to being an agnostic instead of an atheist FEEL like you're being wishy-washy, or not fully committing to your "belief"? ... I understand that it's only honest to say that we CAN'T be sure, but I sure do hate to show weakness (real or perceived) in an argument. Not at all.  Agnosticism deals with knowledge.  Atheism deals with belief.  The Agnostic position cannot assume whether a thing like a God could exist or not given the lack of sheer evidence for such a things existence. Therefore knowing with any given certainty just isn't possible. The agnostic then makes the claim that a definitive answer with regard to "knowing" of God's existence cannot be given either way. Atheism, however, can state with assurance t...
Read more