Advocatus Atheist

Imagine for a moment, a person who claims all rocks are sacred, and that sitting on one or otherwise touching your ass to it is offensive in the extreme. Additionally, if you incidentally do touch the rock in an way deemed uncouth by them, they demand you apologize. Now, imagine I come along and say, no rocks are sacred, they're just rocks, and they're best for sitting on, scratching with, and generally touching your butt to is not only fine, it's your right to do so. Good. Next, suppose a popular actress comes along and touches her butt to some rocks. Maybe she knocks a few of them over. Still with me? Okay. So JLaw is called out for demeaning the sacred rocks of some Hawaiian people because they say she desecrated it with her woman butt. They demand she apologize. She does. Because, presumably, she's a nice person. Her actions seem to validate this assumption about her character. Now, let me ask you this. Is all of Hawaii going to

According to the folks at Feedspot, a new web-venture media news blog,  the Advocatus Atheist ranks in the top 30 of blogs based on, according to Feedspot, these criteria: Google reputation and Google search ranking Influence and popularity on Facebook, twitter and other social media sites Quality and consistency of posts. Feedspot’s editorial team and expert review   I'm humbled and flattered to be included in these other fine blogs. And I'll put the badge on my site proudly. If anything, the analystics seem sound. And if we're going by raw numbers, well, that's good news for this blog which I've maintained for over a decade. Although I don't post nearly as much as I used to, I still get around to it once in a while. Once a month on average according to Feedspot, Alexa, and Google Analytics. Here's to many more great posts!