On Dave Chappelle and "Gender Realism"
![Image](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEixrteAx2dHl2p7opvQApYztziNJCU8OUWuSGPwp8FVcxiqJwpQFGR7sjt-bsDea2Rb-khrk9Gm9mjqBI33xXYvpwBHg_wEDMBN7OGL65Nvs6T44KRboKJkDalal3kBjntNln_h6hyRVh4/w400-h265/Chappelle-stage-combo.jpg)
The Economist published a piece on Dave Chappelle's "gender realism." The article is behind a paywall, so, of course, I couldn't read it. But the term "gender realism" stoked my ire. Look, if you think biological sex is purely binary -- man and woman, male and female, you're simply uninformed and, most likely, scientifically illiterate. That's on you. Not me. Not anybody else. Look, I get it. You were raised not questioning how the world works and you never cared to learn. That's fine. But, when it comes to biological issues -- don't get up on a pedestal and pontificate ignorance. Nobody wants that. Go out--read the up-to-date research--then get back to me. Gender is, for the most part, a social construct. There are tons of anthropology studies done on it as well as gender identity and gender representation in different cultures/countries across various time periods. Not hard to find. Lots of peer-reviewed papers are published all the time o